Then all of a sudden, why did the Colonel lose his sanity, tore apart the list of probables he himself had prepared a few days earlier and brought back a certain Virender Sehwag out of nowhere and for no obvious reasons? Or is it that his stand-off with the Board on writing columns has robbed him off his common sense?
Maybe Sehwag would come good Down Under, maybe he won’t. To be honest, I have my doubts. Sorry Colonel, but I think gremlins have crept into the machine. At a time when domestic trundlers continue to harass him on the most docile of tracks under the Sun, you have to be outrageously optimistic to expect him to come good in
Eerily, this utter disregard to a system put in place by themselves seems in vogue in BCCI these days. Remember how they sought applications from all and sundry for the coach’s job only to announce later that Graham Ford and John Emburey have been invited for interview?
Again, hours before Gary Kirsten arrived inMy heart bleeds for the like of Aakash Chopra. Runs have been flowing from his blade and many still fondly remember how he thwarted the Oz attack at their den. Compare it to Sehwag’s scores in domestic matches since he was dropped -- 16, 0, 9, 32 and 9.
Did Colonel showed the courtesy to reach out for his cell and make a call to Aakash and tell him sorry? My fear, he did not.
2 comments:
Pitch forked from no where, couldn't have said it better myself.
This one was logic-defying, mind-numbing decision...how you explain it to those who were in the list of probables and still could not make the cut? Next time they announce such a short-list, not too many would take it too seriously.
One Ian Chappell comment -- that leaving out Sehwag a mistake-- saw the selectors developing an inferiority complex and taking a U-turn. It was not what Sehwag DID with the bat, but what is MIGHT do with the bat that earned him a berth. God save Indian cricket.
Post a Comment